Quests for GODL: @roolzquest_bot 🐲 NFT & Anime on Telegram/TON Channel: @roolzgods Web: Roolz.ai Twitter.com/Roolznft
Curious to see what exactly the team has scanmed. Team has delivered everything they said they would. They are still here, attention to ton is just burned out. Not a lot of projects thriving unless they spend a lot of money on buybacks.
Читать полностью…Is Thursday the end of the week for you?) Wait, there should be news soon)
Читать полностью…Why can't team transition to another chain then?
Читать полностью…I'm just here to say God Bless ROoLZ and I'll support you guys till eternity.
You didn't disappoint your community and that alone means my undying loyalty to you guys.
Fake pumps are useless. Growth should come from good news and actual work done. But judging by this screenshot, the team isn’t interested in that. Looks like Gate just asked them to move coins for 'liquidity'
Читать полностью…This is a mini anime that was created using AI.
The project has a basic mini-anime series, which can be roolzgods/playlist/RoOLZ%20Anime-7418557212689222422">viewed here
I’ve reviewed the latest updates, and there are several concerning points that need clarification:
1. Unclear NFT Integration & Monetization Shift
User asked: "Do we have to buy packs now? What happens to the old NFTs?"
The response ("NFTs will grant packs and GODL staking") is vague.
How exactly will old NFTs be used? Will they retain value, or are they being phased out?
Saying "if pickup is good, we can work on integrating NFTs" sounds like an afterthought—NFTs shouldn’t be a "maybe" if they were previously sold as core assets.
2. Focus on Monetization Over Gameplay
A user rightly noted: "Focus on gameplay, not just monetization."
Yet the response emphasizes "measuring engagement" and "iterating"—marketing terms that don’t address core game design.
Why launch paid booster packs before clarifying how gameplay works?
3. Red Flags in Communication
"The market isn’t treating us well…" → What does this mean? Low funding? Poor sales? Transparency is key.
"We’d rather release something now than keep building in the shadows" → This sounds like justifying an unfinished product.
4. Paywall Concerns
Q: "Can we play without buying packs?"
A: "Working on an invite system + free packs" → This isn’t a real answer.
"Working on" means it’s not ready.
Will free players be at a severe disadvantage?
5. Uncertain Timelines
Promising testing "in June" is good, but why is the game in "Final Testing" if core systems (NFT integration, free access) aren’t finalized?
Summary: Trust Requires Clarity
Right now, this feels like:
A rushed monetization model (boosters) without clear NFT utility.
Avoidance of direct questions about gameplay and fairness.
High reliance on vague promises ("we’ll iterate").
We need clear answers:
How will old NFTs function in this new system?
What guarantees do free players have?
Is this becoming a pay-to-win game?
The community supports you, but trust requires transparency—not marketing talk.
Will we be able to play without buying packs?
Читать полностью…I'm really looking forward to it ! June ?
Читать полностью…I think, Good idea 👍🏻 I still buy Godl all the time and I believe in you!
Читать полностью…Today during the Ton real talk space, roolz was mentioned
Читать полностью…I still believe in GODL if them like make e -1000% GODL to $1 or nothing
Hodl tight
Yeah we will try and reintroduce it and get it running properly when the game is closer - we are having some issues expect some updates - timelines - and beta tests in july. Thanks for ongoing support 🙂
Читать полностью…Not even 5days, since inception of this one
Читать полностью…Working on invite system + free pack system.
Читать полностью…Yeah gonna make June happen for testing at least and maybe first release to community 🙂 !
Читать полностью…Hope we can start alpha testing soon and get some feedback!
Читать полностью…