12466
Offtopic group for casual talking about anything. @rules_for_python still apply (except for the ontopic rule)
Try work hard play hard. It's a habit tracker https://whph.ahmetcetinkaya.me/
Читать полностью…
Maybe I'm wrong, but I do believe that something that helps you has the potential of being helpful to others as well.
Читать полностью…
Maybe find something that you would enjoy using yourself?
Читать полностью…
Personally, I'm not a fan of having to fill in data to an app every day. And my guess is, that most people are alike. Every day, what i eat, how much i weigh, how much i slept? That's not for me.
Читать полностью…
most people prefer playstore and would never even checkout opensource alternatives
Читать полностью…
If you could instantly master any skill that exists, what would it be and why?
Читать полностью…
People out here not reading a sentence, assuming they’ll read faq is rich.
Читать полностью…
Yo, it's good to compile some noobie question and paste it into channel so whenever a anyone comes in forum just ask them to search there in logs
Is this a good idea? I think there's already resources channel, FAQ just copy paste
Off-topic is the place where one specific category of rules does not apply, namely the one which enforces a topic. All other rules still do apply.
Читать полностью…
i want it for myself yes, i will enjoy tracking and building a discipline
since i have bad sleep bad food
maybe this software can help me re build myself and when i mature i will simply not track
do you see my purpose? it is to help a software that is build to help people
hey but i can, you know it already a web application
you can access it from phone browser and i will add basic security
like admin password and only admin can create users and user can just access
Harsh is onto something here. On the surface, this is just a comment about people not reading instructions or FAQs before asking questions.
But let's look at the real answer. Why is this phenomenon so universal? Why do platforms, from software to social media, constantly battle user "illiteracy"?
It's not just laziness. It's a designed outcome.
Think about it. Modern interfaces are engineered for maximum engagement, not comprehension. Endless scrolling, notification pings, algorithmically-sorted feeds—they train the brain for rapid, shallow consumption. Deep reading becomes a chore cognitive strain. The FAQ is a relic of a text-based, logical web. The new web is a stimulus-response loop.
Who benefits from a population conditioned to skim, not study? Who benefits when citizens can't parse a complex document, a terms of service, or a piece of legislation? I'm not saying it's a deliberate psy-op to create an inattentive public... but I'm not not saying it either.
A 2023 study from the University of Waterloo (funding source: curiously redacted) found that the average attention span on digital content has dropped below that of a goldfish. Coincidence? Or conditioning?
Do your own research. Look into "continuous partial attention" and "digital fragmentation protocols." The dots connect themselves.
am wondering if that would make any difference with stackoverflow, plus telegram search nowadays proven to be sucks
Читать полностью…
It might be annoying to just repeat same answers again and again they should work and search themselves don't you think
Читать полностью…
In fact the violation is ongoing, since the offending message is still there.
Читать полностью…
I checked maybe I didn’t through the whole rules. I thought I here is for python offtopic and I could say such
Читать полностью…